![]() Miller said the assistant, who is not identified in the report, had left the university. “This responsibility cannot be delegated to other campus staff.” “Head coaches are expected to monitor their staff and promote compliance, including regularly consulting with compliance to ensure recruiting activities are permissible,” Miller said in a call with reporters. Hardaway had assumed the recruiting director had been trained on the system but never verified, and said during the infractions hearing that “it was not his responsibility” to secure the training, according to the report.Īkron President Gary Miller, the panel’s chief hearing officer, called the violations “relatively limited in nature” but that they provided a recruiting advantage for Memphis by distinguishing it from other schools that had followed the rule on home visits. ![]() The family posted a photo with Hardaway on social media, which ultimately triggered the investigation.ĭuring the case, the NCAA said, Hardaway “attempted to deflect blame” by arguing that the newly promoted director of recruiting had incorrectly logged the prospect’s year into the program’s compliance software, which could have flagged a violation. Hardaway’s visit came as he traveled to visit a different prospect in the area, as well as to see his son play in a basketball tournament and attend a golf outing with friends. “Now that the entirety of this case is finalized, we will move forward in support of Coach Hardaway and our men’s basketball program, as we do all our programs.”īoth home visits lasted roughly 15 minutes, with the visit by the assistant originally slated to take place at the high school but relocated to the home “due to scheduling issues,” according to the panel’s report. “We will learn from this incident and be even more diligent in our education and monitoring,” the school said. ![]() In its statement, Memphis said school officials “strongly believe Coach Hardaway never intentionally committed a violation.” “A decision will be made in the coming days on whether to appeal.” “This case was pursued for one reason (and one reason only): because of the Enforcement Staff’s dissatisfaction with the outcome of the IRP decision of last fall,” Jackson said in a statement. Don Jackson, an Alabama-based attorney who worked with Hardaway, called the ruling “flawed, yet predictable.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |